ctDNA-based fusion detection for advanced colorectal cancer with a partner-agnostic assay.

186 Background: Actionable mutations can predict therapeutic benefit in patients with advanced malignancies, though clinical relevance of fusion testing for advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) remains undefined. Identification of fusions from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has previously been restricted to defined oncogenic fusion partners. To improve the sensitivity for fusion detection, we evaluated a partner-agnostic fusion analysis from ctDNA of patients with aCRC. Methods: De-identified data from Guardant Health was reviewed for 18,558 patients with aCRC who underwent ctDNA NGS testing by Guardant360 (Redwood City, CA) between 2017-2022. Fusion results were analyzed with a partner-agnostic bioinformatic approach. A fusion was defined as “clonal” if the variant allele frequency (VAF) ratio exceed ≥50% of highest somatic VAF, and “subclonal” if < 50% maxVAF. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status [MSI-high (bMSI-H) or microsatellite stable (bMSS)] and anti-EGFR exposure signature were determined using prior methods. Associations between fusion occurrence and coexisting alterations were performed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Fusions were detected in 221 (1.2%) of patients with aCRC. 258 activating fusions were detected in 187 patients; FGFR3 (N = 59, 23%), RET N = 55, 21%), BRAF (N = 43, 17%), and ALK (N = 41, 16%) were most frequent. There were 71 previously unreported fusions in 28 additional patients; RET (N = 16; 23%), MET (N = 15, 21%), and BRAF (N = 11; 15%) were most prevalent. Clonal fusions occurred in 7% (18/258) of all activating fusions; RET (5/18, 28%) and FGFR3 (3/18, 17%) were most common and associated with bMSI-H status relative to bMSS (27% vs 4%, OR 8.165, 95% CI 2.332-33.99; p = 0.0076). Clonal fusions occurred less commonly in samples with a prior EGFR signature (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-0.997, p = 0.049). Most detected fusions were subclonal including ALK, FGFR1-3, MET, RET and ROS1. Conclusions: Highly specific partner-agnostic fusion detection is feasible to increase sensitivity of ctDNA assay performance. Oncogenic fusions occurred in ~1% of all patients with aCRC. Clonal fusions as oncogenic drivers were infrequent and associated with bMSI-H status. Subclonal fusions were more common and occur in a setting consistent with prior exposure to anti-EGFR therapies. Reporting fusion partners and clonality from ctDNA may guide oncologists on the appropriate context for consideration of fusion-directed treatments.