Metronomic Temozolomide (mTMZ) and Bevacizumab-The Safe and Effective Frontier for Treating Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs): A Single-Center Experience

Simple Summary A recent study explored the use of metronomic temozolomide (mTMZ) and bevacizumab in treating metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). By analyzing data from 30 patients, this research provides insights into survival rates, tolerance to the treatment, and the spectrum of side effects observed. The results, showing promise, warrant further investigation into how this treatment combination compares with the established temozolomide-capecitabine (CAPTEM) regimen.Abstract Addressing the persistent challenges in treating metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) demands ongoing refinement and innovation in therapeutic strategies. This study investigates the potential advantages of combining metronomic temozolomide (mTMZ) with bevacizumab for patients diagnosed with metastatic NETs, particularly focusing on those with a Ki-67 index under 55%. Data from 30 patients were analyzed, using key performance indicators such as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rates to therapy, to gauge the treatment's efficacy. The results were encouraging: the median PFS recorded was 16.3 months, and the OS was 25.9 months. The disease control rate (DCR) reached an impressive 86.7%, and the objective response rate (ORR) stood at 63.3%. The treatment regimen was well-tolerated, with no reported instances of grade 4 toxicities. Such a safety profile indicates that this regimen may be particularly advantageous for older, fragile patients who might struggle with conventional dosage levels. These initial findings suggest that the mTMZ and bevacizumab combination could potentially rival the conventional temozolomide-capecitabine therapy in managing metastatic NETs. We aimed to meticulously assess the efficacy of the mTMZ and bevacizumab combination in treating metastatic NETs. Given the initial promising results, a more conclusive understanding of its efficacy will require further research through larger, multicenter prospective clinical trials.