Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23.

Micaela Gal,Alison Cooper,Natalie Joseph-Williams, Elizabeth C Doe,Ruth Lewis,Rebecca-Jane Law,Sally Anstey, Nathan Davies, Amy Walters, Robert Orford,Brendan Collins,Lisa Trigg,Chris Roberts, Sarah Meredith, Steven Macey,Andrew P Carson-Stevens, Jane Greenwell, Ffion Coomber,Adrian G Edwards

crossref(2023)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Abstract: The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was established from 2021-23 to ensure that the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) relevant research evidence was readily available to inform health and social care policy and practice decision-makers. Although decisions need to be evidence-based, ensuring that accessible and relevant research evidence is available to decision-makers is challenging, especially in a rapidly evolving pandemic environment when timeframes for decision-making are days or weeks rather than months or years. We set up knowledge mobilisation processes to bridge the gap between evidence review and informing decisions, making sure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time. Aims and objectives: To describe the knowledge mobilisation processes used by the WCEC, evaluate the impact of the WCEC rapid evidence reviews, and share lessons learned. Methods: Our knowledge mobilisation methods were flexible and tailored to meet stakeholders needs. They included stakeholder co-production in our rapid evidence review processes, stakeholder-informed and participatory knowledge mobilisation, wider dissemination of outputs and associated activities including public engagement, capacity building and sharing of methodologies. Feedback on processes and evidence of impact was collected via stakeholder engagement and a stakeholder survey. Results: Findings indicate that WCEC knowledge mobilisation processes successfully supported co-production and use of rapid evidence review findings by scientific advisors and policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified barriers and facilitators are of potential relevance to wider evidence initiatives. Knowledge mobilisation require sustained development to continue building stakeholder links, embed co-production and sustain knowledge mobilisation as we move to support evidence-based policy and practice decision-making beyond the pandemic. Discussion and Conclusion: The WCEC knowledge mobilisation processes successfully supported co-production and use of rapid evidence review findings by scientific advisors and policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified barriers and facilitators are of potential relevance to wider evidence initiatives. Knowledge mobilisation require sustained development to continue building stakeholder links, embed co-production and sustain knowledge mobilisation as we move to support evidence-based policy and practice decision-making beyond the pandemic.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要