Is ultraviolet light disinfection fit to be the future standard for the disinfection of flexible endoscopes without a working channel?

Yana Halmans,David J. Wellenstein, Michael Romijn, Suzan Cremers, Jannie J. Smit,Joost Hopman,Robert P. Takes,Guido B. van den Broek

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY(2024)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Objective: To investigate colony-forming unit (CFU) reduction on contaminated flexible endoscopes (FEs) without a working channel after UV-C light disinfection, compared to the current disinfection method with the endoscope washer disinfector (EWD).Design, setting and participants: After pharyngolaryngoscopy, a manual pre-cleaning with tap water was performed. A culture was then collected by rolling the distal 8-10 cm of the FE over an Agar plate. The FE was disinfected using the D60 (60-s disinfection process with UV-C light) or the EWD (gold standard reprocessing process with water and chemicals). Another culture was then taken. After incubation, a CFU count was performed.Results: A total of 200 FEs without a working channel were divided equally between the two disinfection groups. After clinical use and manual pre-cleaning, 84 of the 100 (84.0%) (UV-C light group) and 79 of the 100 (79.0%) (EWD) FEs were contaminated with at least 1 CFU. FEs that showed no contamination after use were excluded from further analysis. After disinfection with UV-C light, 72 (85.7%) FEs showed no contamination (i.e., 0 CFUs) versus 66 (83.5%) FEs after reprocessing with the EWD.Conclusion: There is no difference in CFUs reduction on contaminated FEs without a working channel between UV-C light disinfection and the current gold standard, the EWD.
更多
查看译文
关键词
disinfection,endoscopes,laryngoscopes,ultraviolet rays
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要