Legal Liability of Clinical Ethics Services in Australia: "Should I Be More Worried Than I Am?"

Sharon Feldman,Carolyn Johnston

JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
A key function of clinical ethics services (CESs) is to provide decision making support to health care providers in ethically challenging cases. Cases referred for ethics consultation are likely to involve diverging views or conflict, or to confront the boundaries of appropriate medical practice. Such cases might also attract legal action due to their contentious nature. As CESs become more prevalent in Australia, this article considers the potential legal liability of a CES and its members. With no reported litigation against a CES in Australia, we look to international experience and first principles. We consider the prospects of a claim in negligence, the most likely legal action against a CES, through application of legal principles to a hypothetical case scenario. We conclude that, although unlikely to be successful at this time, a CES could face answerable claims in negligence brought by patients (and families) who are the subject of ethics case consultation.
更多
查看译文
关键词
ethics consultation, clinical ethics committees, legal duties, liability
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要