Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations in PROOF 302: A phase III trial of infigratinib (BGJ398) as adjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC)

4511 Background: Radical surgery with or without (neo)adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy [(N)AC] is standard in fit pts with muscle invasive UC of bladder (UBC) or upper tract (UTUC). However, recurrence rates are high, underscoring the need for novel therapies. Since up to 70% of UTUC and 20% of UBC tumors were reported to harbor FGFR3 alterations, targeting this pathway is a rational approach. Infigratinib is a selective FGFR1–3 inhibitor with efficacy in advanced UC with FGFR3 alterations [Pal et al. 2018]. PROOF 302 investigated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant infigratinib vs placebo in pts with high-risk invasive UC. Methods: PROOF 302 was a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial for pts with high-risk invasive UTUC or UBC (≤15%) with FGFR3 alteration (i.e. mutation, gene fusion / translocation) with residual (≥ypT2 and/or ypN+) tumor after NAC, or pts ineligible for, or refusing, cisplatin-based AC, ≤120 days post-surgery. Pts were randomized 1:1 to infigratinib 125 mg or placebo daily on days 1–21 every 28 days for up to 52 weeks or until recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Primary endpoint: centrally reviewed disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints: investigator-assessed DFS, metastasis-free survival, overall survival, safety/tolerability. Exploratory endpoints: QOL, pharmacokinetics, genomic analysis of tumor and cfDNA. Assessment of genomic alterations was pursued using descriptive statistics. Results: We present the results of the genomic analysis of radical surgery tissues from pts screened for the trial using the FoundationOne platform. Out of 617 pts screened, 188 (30.5%) had alterations in FGFR 1-4 genes: 102/237 (43%) in UTUC, 85/369 (23%) in MIBC and 1/11 (9%) with unknown tumor origin. Of these 188 pts, median age 74 (32-90 years), 76% were male, 55% had UTUC, 44% had UBC. Genomic alterations are shown. In UTUC, FGFR3 had 56% single-nucleotide variations (SNV) and insertions/deletions (INDELS), 40% amplifications and 70% structural variants (SV). In UBC, FGFR3 had 44% SNV and INDELS, 60% amplifications and 30% SV. Conclusions: FGFR3 alterations were seen in only 19% of all pts screened for PROOF-302, a trial that was enriched for UTUC: 71/237 (30%) of UTUC and 48/369 (13%) of UBC. The trial was stopped early by the sponsor, but the genomic analysis provides insights into the prevalence of FGFR3 alterations; assessment of correlations with the primary/secondary endpoints is ongoing. The nature and frequency of co-occurring alterations in tissue samples is being investigated to help inform combination therapy strategies and putative resistance mechanisms. Clinical trial information: NCT04197986 . [Table: see text]