Remote evaluation of NAVIFY Oncology Hub using clinical simulation

e13622 Background: Clinical workflow is critical for the efficient and safe delivery of patient care. NAVIFY Oncology Hub is a clinical workflow solution that provides clinicians with a comprehensive view of a patient’s clinical journey and aims to enable effective and efficient care decisions in oncology care. This study explored the use of remote clinical simulation to assess the usability, efficiency, and cognitive burden associated with using NAVIFY Oncology Hub. Methods: Twenty seven (27) board-certified oncologists were recruited to participate in remote evaluation sessions conducted via teleconference. Participants were instructed to review and synthesize clinical information from 10 synthetic breast cancer cases using NAVIFY Oncology Hub (case order was randomized). After completing the exercise, participants answered a survey which included the system usability scale (SUS), Likert-scale questions designed for participants to self-report the efficiency of completing each task, and the NASA Task Load index (to assess cognitive burden). The survey and a short interview was also used to gather structured feedback on the solution, patient cases, and study methods. Results: NAVIFY Oncology Hub scored an “excellent” 82 on the system usability scale (SUS). Most participants (67%) indicated that they would be likely to use the solution in their clinical practice, with approximately half (48%) reporting they would recommend it to a colleague. The majority of participants (96%) said they were “a lot more efficient” or “somewhat more efficient” when using NAVIFY Oncology Hub to review patient information. The majority of participants (78%) felt it would be “significantly better” or “somewhat better” than their existing solution at facilitating patient discussion and coordinating care. On the NASA Task Load Index survey, the majority of participants (63%) required low or very low levels of mental demand, temporal demand, and effort to successfully complete tasks using NAVIFY Oncology Hub. The majority of participants (91%) felt the synthetic patient cases were either ‘very similar’ or ‘somewhat similar’ to cases seen in routine clinical practice, and that the tasks completed during the sessions were ‘very similar’ or ‘somewhat similar’ to their clinical practice. Conclusions: This novel clinical simulation study shows early evidence that NAVIFY Oncology Hub has high usability, potential to increase overall efficiency and reduce cognitive burden on oncologists compared to contemporary EHR systems. Clinical trial information: NCT05478135 .