Superior outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) among patients (Pts) >= 60 years (yrs) treated with cladribine (CLAD), low dose cytarabine (LDAC) plus venetoclax (Ven) for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

7047 Background: CLAD/LDAC/VEN alternating with AZA-VEN has shown promising outcomes in older pts with AML ( Kadia, JCO Nov 2022). Improved disease control and preserved performance status achieved with CLAD/LDAC/VEN treatment, may translate into superior post-SCT outcomes. Methods: We compared outcomes of pts ≥ 60 yrs of age treated on the phase II study of CLAD-LDAC-VEN who underwent SCT in 1st remission (CR1) to a retrospective cohort of pts ≥ 60 yrs treated with hypomethylating agent (HMA)-VEN based or intensive (INT) therapy who underwent SCT in CR1 between 2013-2022. Relapse free survival (RFS) was from response to relapse/death & overall survival (OS) from start of therapy to death. Results: 35 pts treated with CLAD-LDAC-VEN were compared to 42 pts treated with INT & 40 pts with HMA-VEN therapy for remission induction prior to SCT at our center (Table). The median age of pts in the low-intensity arms were similar (68 yrs), but lower on the INT arm (62 yrs). More pts post INT therapy received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC). At a median follow up of 17+ months (m) for CLAD-LDAC-VEN arm, 59 m for INT arm, and 30 m for HMA arm, the median RFS (NR vs. 50 m vs. 20 m respectively, p <0.01) and OS (NR vs. 58 m vs. 32 m respectively, p < 0.01) was superior for the CLAD-LDAC-VEN arm. 3-yr cumulative incidence of relapse & NRM (as competing events) were both significantly lower with CLAD-LDAC-VEN (4% and 7%) compared to INT (17% and 23%) or HMA-VEN (41% and 27%) therapy. Conclusions: Older pts with AML proceeding to SCT after CLAD-LDAC-VEN therapy had significantly improved survival, characterized by significantly lower rates of NRM and relapse compared to HMA-VEN or INT therapies. Larger studies and longer follow up is needed to confirm its benefit. [Table: see text]