Performance of the new MC-80 automated digital cell morphology analyser in detection of normal and abnormal blood cells: Comparison with the CellaVision DM9600

IntroductionMindray MC-80 is an automated system for digital imaging of white blood cells (WBCs) and their pre-classification. The objective of this work is to analyse its performance comparing it with the CellaVision & REG; DM9600.MethodsA total of 445 samples were used, 194 normal and 251 abnormal: acute leukaemia (100), myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (33), lymphoid neoplasms (50), plasma cell neoplasms (14), infections (49) and thrombocytopenia (5). WBC pre-classification values with the MC-80 and DM9600 were compared with (1) the microscope, (2) Mindray BC-6800Plus differentials in only normal samples, and (3) confirmed or reclassified images (post-classification). Pearson's correlation, Lin's concordance, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland-Altman plots were used. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values for abnormal cells using the MC-80 were calculated.ResultsThe PPV and NPV were above 98% and 99%, for normal samples. For immature granulocytes (IG), NPV and PPV were 100% and 74.2%. When comparing the WBC differentials using the MC-80, the microscope and the BC-6800Plus, no differences were found except for basophils and IG. Our results showed good agreement between the pre- and post-classification of normal WBC, including IG, quantified by high correlation and concordance values (0.91-1). Sensitivity and specificity for blasts were 0.984 and 0.640. The MC-80 detected abnormal lymphocytes in 30% of the smears from patients with lymphoid neoplasm. Plasma cell identification was better using the DM9600. The sensitivity and specificity for erythroblast detection were 1 and 0.890.ConclusionWe found that the MC-80 shows high performance for WBC differentials for both normal samples and patients with haematological diseases.