A structural and functional comparison between two recombinant human lubricin proteins: Recombinant human proteoglycan-4 (rhPRG4) vs ECF843.

Proteoglycan 4 (PRG4, lubricin) is a mucin-like glycoprotein present on the ocular surface that has both boundary lubricating and anti-inflammatory properties. Full-length recombinant human PRG4 (rhPRG4) has been shown to be clinically effective in improving signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED). In vitro, rhPRG4 has been shown to reduce inflammation-induced cytokine production and NFκB activity in corneal epithelial cells, as well as to bind to and inhibit MMP-9 activity. A different form of recombinant human lubricin (ECF843), produced from the same cell line as rhPRG4 but manufactured using a different process, was recently assessed in a DED clinical trial. However, ECF843 did not significantly improve signs or symptoms of DED compared to vehicle. Initial published characterization of ECF843 showed it had a smaller hydrodynamic diameter and was less negatively charged than native PRG4. Further examination of the structural and functional properties of ECF843 and rhPRG4 could contribute to the understanding of what led to their disparate clinical efficacy. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize and compare rhPRG4 and ECF843 in vitro, both biophysically and functionally. Hydrodynamic diameter and charge were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential, respectively. Size and molecular weight was determined for individual species by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) with in-line DLS and multi-angle light scattering (MALS). Bond structure was measured by Raman spectroscopy, and sedimentation properties were measured by analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC). Functionally, MMP-9 inhibition was measured using a commercial MMP-9 activity kit, coefficient of friction was measured using an established boundary lubrication test at a latex-glass interface, and collagen 1-binding ability was measured by quart crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCMD). Additionally, the ability of rhPRG4 and ECF843 to inhibit urate acid crystal formation and cell adhesion was assessed. ECF843 had a significantly smaller hydrodynamic diameter and was less negatively charged than rhPRG4, as assessed by DLS and zeta potential. Size was further explored with SEC-DLS-MALS, which indicated that while rhPRG4 had 3 main peaks, corresponding to monomer, dimer, and multimer as expected, ECF843 had 2 peaks that were similar in size and molecular weight compared to rhPRG4's monomer peak and a third peak that was significantly smaller in both size and molar mass than the corresponding peak of rhPRG4. Raman spectroscopy demonstrated that ECF843 had significantly more disulfide bonds, which are functionally determinant structures, relative to the carbon-carbon backbone compared to rhPRG4, and AUC indicated that ECF843 was more compact than rhPRG4. Functionally, ECF843 was significantly less effective at inhibiting MMP-9 activity and functioning as a boundary lubricant compared to rhPRG4, as well as being slower to bind to collagen 1. Additionally, ECF843 was significantly less effective at inhibiting urate acid crystal formation and at preventing cell adhesion. Collectively, these data demonstrate ECF843 and rhPRG4 are significantly different in both structure and function. Given that a protein's structure sets the foundation for its interactions with other molecules and tissues in vivo, which ultimately determine its function, these differences most likely contributed to the disparate DED clinical trial results.