Effects of soil data accuracy on outputs of irrigation scheduling tools

. A widely used irrigation scheduling method is based on modeling soil water balance, which requires several key inputs, including soil data. Many scheduling tools developed using this method rely on publicly available soil data, such as the United States Department of Agriculture's Web Soil Survey (WSS). While soil survey data are a valuable source of information for general farm and natural resource planning and management at large scales, inaccuracies in soil conditions at field and subfield scales can hamper efficient agricultural water management through irrigation scheduling tools. To illuminate the implications of the localized inaccuracies, this study estimated the errors in WSS soil textural data at 18 sites in three regions of western Oklahoma through comparison with in-situ sampling (ISS) data. The effects of errors on estimated water fluxes were also investigated for dominant crops of each region over a 15-year (2006-2020) period. The findings demonstrated that WSS soil textures were finer than ISS at most sites and soil layers, resulting in generally greater root zone total available water estimates. Differences in seasonal irrigation demand estimates when WSS data were used instead of ISS reached 20% at one site but were within & PLUSMN;9% among the regions. Half of the estimated seasonal irrigation differences for all sites, years, and crops were within & PLUSMN;25 mm. Soil evaporation, deep percolation, and runoff fluxes were also impacted by soil data source, albeit to a smaller degree than irrigation, at levels and directions (over or underestimation) that were dependent on the sign and magnitude of WSS errors, as well as precipitation amounts and timing. Overall, errors in WSS data may not have a major impact at regional scales, but the effects on individual irrigated farms may be severe depending on the magnitude of difference between WSS data and true soil conditions.