Mini-versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric population: A randomized controlled trial

IntroductionMini PCNL has gained popularity in adult patients due to reduction in the complication rate with comparable stone free rate. There is paucity of level 1 evidence regarding the benefit of mini PCNL in the pediatric group.ObjectiveWe performed a randomised study to compare mini PCNL (mPCNL) with standard PCNL (sPCNL) for the management of renal calculi in patients less than 18 years of age in terms of safety, efficacy, and stone-free rate (SFR).Materials and methodsA randomised controlled trial was performed on 50 children who underwent PCNL from June 2015 to March 2021, who were divided into two groups. Group I had 25 patients managed with mPCNL (sheath size 16.5 Fr) and Group II had 25 patients who underwent sPCNL (sheath size 26 Fr). Primary outcomes including stone free rates (SFR) and hemoglobin drop and secondary outcomes like operative time, complications, pain score, need of analgesia, incidence of nephrostomy site leak, hospital stay in days were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe mean age of patients in groups I and II was 9.4 +/- 2.6 and 10.4 +/- 2.26 years, respectively (p = 0.15). The mean stone sizes in both groups I and II were 18.6 +/- 2.56 and 20.2 +/- 3.58 mm, respectively (p > 0.05).The stone free rate for group I was 88% and for group II, 92% (p = 0.64). The average drop in hemoglobin was higher in group II compared to group I (1.1 +/- 0.31 g/dl and 1.7 +/- 0.23 g/dl respectively; p < 0.0001), however the mean blood transfusion rate was not significantly different in both groups.The operating time was shorter in group II compared to group I (p-value - 0.0030). The pain scores were lesser for the group I. Grade I complications were higher in group II as compared to group I (p-0.047); however, grade II complications were comparable in both groups. The mean hospital stay was not significantly different in both groups.DiscussionThis study confirms the role of mini PCNL in pediatric patients with renal stones. The stone clearance rate of mini PCNL is equivalent to standard PCNL, with lesser blood loss and postoperative complications, however with longer operative time during mPCNL. The small number of the participants in both arms is a limitation of this study and may also reflect fewer children with urolithiasis being treated surgically even in a tertiary care referral centre.ConclusionsMini-PCNL offers equivalent stone free outcome with lower complications rate compared to the standard PCNL for all types of renal stones.