Preliminary results on validity and reliability from two prospective cohort studies on a new Neonatal Coma Score

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION(2024)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Objective To collect data on content/face validity and interobserver agreement for a Neonatal Coma Score (NCS) in well full term neonates and on construct validity in unwell and preterm babies, specifically how the NCS changed with gestational age and illness. Design Prospective cohort studies. Setting Two UK tertiary neonatal units (Sheffield and Leeds). Patients 151 well full term (>= 37 weeks gestational age) newborn babies recruited between January and February 2020 in Sheffield and April and May 2021 in Leeds; 101 sick preterm and full term babies admitted to Sheffield neonatal unit between January 2021 and May 2022. Intervention A new NCS. Main outcome measures Determination of normal values in well babies born >= 37 weeks gestational age; data on how the NCS changes with gestational age and illness. Results Face validity was demonstrated during development of the NCS. The median NCS of well, full term newborn babies was 15 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.84). In the 'well' preterm population, 95% <28 weeks had a score >= 11; 28-31 weeks >= 11; 32-36 weeks >= 13 and 37-44 weeks 14-15. The NCS dropped during periods of deterioration, demonstrating evidence of construct validity. Criterion validity was not assessed. Conclusions The NCS has good intraobserver agreement in well full term babies, with a normal NCS 14-15. The NCS in preterm neonates depended on gestational age, and deterioration from baseline was associated with illness. Further work is needed to determine normal scores each gestational age, reliability at lower levels, how early the NCS identifies deterioration and comparison with other assessment tools to demonstrate criterion validity.
更多
查看译文
关键词
intensive care units, neonatal,neonatology,neurology,nursing care
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要