Training in microvascular anastomosis - A randomized comparative study between chicken thigh specimen and live rat

Training in microsurgical techniques on live rats is the gold standard, but raises ethical issues related to animal welfare and cost. The aim of this study was to compare acquisition of microsurgical techniques with primary training on chicken thigh specimens. Seventy six students were randomly assigned: 23 to exclusive rat training and 53 to primary chicken-leg training. Both groups were then evaluated on aortic suture and jugular aortic bypass surgery in live rats. The primary criterion for successful anastomosis was the patency test. The survival of the rat, the number of severe vascular wounds and the quality of the dissection were also assessed. Aortic anastomoses were of significantly better quality in the chicken group (p = 0.041). There was no significant difference in the number of serious injuries, rat mortality, or quality of dissection (p > 0.05). For jugular aortic bypass surgery, dissection quality (p = 0.02) and patency test (p = 0.05) were better in the chicken-leg group. There was no significant difference in number of severe wounds or rat mortality (p > 0.05). Students who started their microsurgical training on a chicken leg did not perform worse than those with exclusive live rat training. Initial training on chicken thigh specimens seems to be a reliable alternative to training on live models. Level of evidence: Level II - Randomized controlled trial.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of SFCM.