A machine learning-based scoring system and ten factors associated with hip fracture occurrence in the elderly.

Masaru Uragami, Kozo Matsushita, Yuto Shibata, Shu Takata,Tatsuki Karasugi,Takanao Sueyoshi,Tetsuro Masuda,Takayuki Nakamura,Takuya Tokunaga,Satoshi Hisanaga,Masaki Yugami,Kazuki Sugimoto, Ryuji Yonemitsu, Katsumasa Ideo, Yuko Fukuma, Kosei Takata,Takahiro Arima, Jyunki Kawakami,Kazuya Maeda,Naoto Yoshimura, Hideto Matsunaga,Yuki Kai,Shuntaro Tanimura,Masaki Shimada,Makoto Tateyama,Kana Miyamoto, Ryuta Kubo, Rui Tajiri, Xiao Tian,Fuka Homma, Jun Morinaga, Yoshinori Yamanouchi,Minoru Takebayashi, Naoto Kajitani,Yusuke Uehara,Takeshi Miyamoto

Bone(2023)

引用 0|浏览11
暂无评分
摘要
Hip fractures are fragility fractures frequently seen in persons over 80-years-old. Although various factors, including decreased bone mineral density and a history of falls, are reported as hip fracture risks, few large-scale studies have confirmed their relevance to individuals older than 80, and tools to assess contributions of various risks to fracture development and the degree of risk are lacking. We recruited 1395 fresh hip fracture patients and 1075 controls without hip fractures and comprehensively evaluated various reported risk factors and their association with hip fracture development. We initially constructed a predictive model using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), a machine learning algorithm, incorporating all 40 variables and evaluated the model's performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), yielding a value of 0.87. We also employed SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values to evaluate each feature importance and ranked the top 20. We then used a stepwise selection method to determine key factors sequentially until the AUC reached a plateau nearly equal to that of all variables and identified the top 10 sufficient to evaluate hip fracture risk. For each, we determined the cutoff value for hip fracture occurrence and calculated scores of each variable based on the respective feature importance. Individual scores were: serum 25(OH)D levels (<10 ng/ml, score 7), femoral neck T-score (<-3, score 5), Barthel index score (<100, score 3), maximal handgrip strength (<18 kg, score 3), GLFS-25 score (≥24, score 2), number of falls in previous 12 months (≥3, score 2), serum IGF-1 levels (<50 ng/ml, score 2), cups of tea/day (≥5, score -2), use of anti-osteoporosis drugs (yes, score -2), and BMI (<18.5 kg/m2, score 1). Using these scores, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the resultant optimal cutoff value was 7, with a specificity of 0.78, sensitivity of 0.75, and AUC of 0.85. These ten factors and the scoring system may represent tools useful to predict hip fracture.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要