Prophylactic ureteral stent placement for the prevention of genitourinary tract injury during hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic ureteral stent placement for the prevention of genitourinary tract injury at the time of cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum. The secondary objectives were to assess mean blood loss, operative time, number of packed red blood cells transfused, and rates of urinary tract infection among patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum with and without prophylactic ureteral stent placement. DATA SOURCES:The search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to February 2022 to December 2022. The protocol for this review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews before data collection (registration number: CRD42022372817). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:All studies that examined differences in the rate of genitourinary tract injury among women undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for prenatally suspected placenta accreta spectrum with and without placement of prophylactic ureteral stents were included. Genitourinary injury was defined as cystotomy, ureteral injury, and/or bladder fistula. Cases of both intentional and unintentional genitourinary injuries were included in the analysis. METHODS:For all studies meeting the inclusion criteria, the following data were extracted: number of included patients, maternal demographic information, obstetrical history, type of invasive placentation, placement of stents (yes or no), type of stent placed, blood loss, operative time, genitourinary tract injury, and urinary tract infection. Pooled data analysis was completed using the Review Manager (version 5.3; Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). The summary measures were reported as summary relative risk or as summary mean difference. The quality and risk of biases of the included studies were assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS:Overall, 9 studies, including 848 patients, fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. Moreover, 523 patients (61.7%) had prophylactic ureteral stents placed, and 325 patients (38.3%) did not. Genitourinary injury occurred in 138 of 523 patients (26.4%) in the ureteral stent group vs 83 of 325 patients (25.5%) in the no ureteral stent group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.20). The mean number of packed red blood cells transfused did not differ between the 2 groups. The pooled analysis demonstrated decreased blood loss among patients who received prophylactic ureteral stents, with a mean difference of 392 mL (95% confidence interval, 52.74-738.13). CONCLUSION:Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in the rates of genitourinary tract injury with the use of prophylactic ureteral stent placement among cases of prenatally suspected placenta accreta spectrum undergoing cesarean hysterectomy.