Physiological-induced conductive response evaluation in specific muscle compartments under hybrid of electrical muscle stimulation and voluntary resistance training by electrical impedance tomography

Objective: The physiological-induced conductive response has been visualised for evaluation in specific muscle compartments under hybrid (hybridEMS) of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) and voluntary resistance training (VRT) by electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Methods: In the experiments, tendency of conductivity distribution images sigma over time was clearly detected for three specific muscle compartments, which are called AM(1) compartment composed of biceps brachii muscle, AM(2) compartment composed of triceps brachii muscle, and AM(3) compartment composed of brachialis muscle, under three training modalities. Results: From the experimental results, the tendency of physiological-induced conductive response are increased in all three training modalities with increasing training time. Correspondingly, the spatial-mean conductivity AM(1),AM(2),AM(3) increased with the conductance value G and extracellular water ratio beta of right arm by bio-impedance analysis (BIA) method. In addition, hybridEMS has the greatest effect on physiological-induced conductive response in AM(1), AM(2), and AM(3). Under hybridEMS, the spatial-mean conductivity increased from (AM1) = 0.154 to (AM1) = 0.810 in AM(1) muscle compartment (n = 8, p < 0.001); (AM2) = 0.040 to (AM2) = 0.254 in AM(2) muscle compartment (n= 8, p < 0.05); (AM3) = 0.078 to (AM3) = 0.497 in AM(3) muscle compartment (n = 8, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The paired-samples t-test results of (AM1,AM2,AM3) under all three training modalities suggest hybridEMS has the most efficient elicitation on physiological induced conductive response compared to VRT and EMS. The effect of EMS on deep muscle compartment (AM3) is slower compared to VRT and hybridEMS, with a significant difference after 15 min of training.