Cost-utility analysis of diagnostic methods for arterial hypertension in primary care for Brazil: ABPM vs. OBPM vs. HBPM.

Rosana Lima Garcia,Marcus Tolentino Silva,Amaury Zatorre Amaral,Giovanio Vieira Silva

Blood pressure monitoring（2023）

引用 0|浏览1

暂无评分

摘要

With a willingness-to-pay threshold of R$35 000 per QALY gained, both ABPM and HBPM are cost-effective methods compared with OBPM in all scenarios. In Brazilian healthcare facilities that currently diagnose AH using OBPM, both ABPM and HBPM may be more cost-effective choices.

查看译文

关键词

ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, cost-utility, home blood pressure monitoring, hypertension, office blood pressure measurement

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要