Effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel versus real-world standard of care in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research(2023)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
To contextualize the effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel versus real-world standard of care (SoC) in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. A retrospective indirect matched comparison study using data from the phase II ELARA trial and the US Flatiron Health Research Database. Complete response rate was 69.1 versus 17.7% and the overall response rate was 85.6 versus 58.1% in tisagenlecleucel versus SoC, post weighting by odds. For overall survival, an estimated reduction in the risk of death was observed in favor of tisagenlecleucel over SoC. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.45 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.88), and for time-to-next treatment was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.15, 0.78) with tisagenlecleucel versus SoC. A consistent trend toward improved efficacy end points was observed in favor of tisagenlecleucel versus SoC.
更多
查看译文
关键词
anti-CD20, CAR-T, follicular lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, real-world evidence, refractory, relapsed, standard of care, tisagenlecleucel
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要