Cervical Osmotic Dilators versus Dinoprostone for Cervical Ripening during Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14 Controlled Trials.

Abdulrahman Al-Matary,Saud A Alsharif,Ibtihal A Bukhari,Saeed Baradwan,Majed S Alshahrani,Khalid Khadawardi,Ehab Badghish,Bayan Albouq,Afnan Baradwan,Mohammed Abuzaid,Haifa Al-Jundy,Abdullah Alyousef,Wael S Ragab,Ahmed Abu-Zaid

American journal of perinatology（2023）

引用 0|浏览0

暂无评分

摘要

· This is the first analysis of cervical osmotic dilators versus PGE2 for cervical ripening during labor.. · There was no difference between both arms regarding the rates of normal vaginal/cesarean deliveries.. · There was no difference between both arms regarding the rates of neonatal adverse events.. · Cervical osmotic dilators had significant lower risk of uterine hyperstimulation compared with PGE2.. · Cervical osmotic dilators may be superior to PGE2 in view of their similar efficacy and better safety..

查看译文

关键词

cervical osmotic dilators, dilapan, lamicel, laminaria, dinoprostone, cervical ripening, labor induction, meta-analysis

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要