Cultivating the Research Landscape for Critical Care Cardiology: The Case for Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials

HomeCirculationVol. 147, No. 22Cultivating the Research Landscape for Critical Care Cardiology: The Case for Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials No AccessArticle CommentaryRequest AccessFull TextAboutView Full TextView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toNo AccessArticle CommentaryRequest AccessFull TextCultivating the Research Landscape for Critical Care Cardiology: The Case for Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials Shashank S. Sinha, Jason N. Katz and David A. Morrow Shashank S. SinhaShashank S. Sinha Correspondence to: Shashank S. Sinha, MD, MSc, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA 22042. Email E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6249-2598 Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA (S.S.S.). Search for more papers by this author , Jason N. KatzJason N. Katz Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (J.N.K.). Search for more papers by this author and David A. MorrowDavid A. Morrow https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-5382 Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) study group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.A.M.). Search for more papers by this author Originally published30 May 2023https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060802Circulation. 2023;147:1637–1639FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 1639.Circulation is available at www.ahajournals.org/journal/circCorrespondence to: Shashank S. Sinha, MD, MSc, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA 22042. Email shashank.sinha@inova.orgReferences1. Sinha SS, Bohula EA, Diepen SV, et al. The intersection between heart failure and critical care cardiology: an international perspective on structure, staffing, and design considerations.J Card Fail. 2022; 28:1703–1716. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.007CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Morrow DA, Fang JC, Fintel DJ, et al; American Heart Association Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Evolution of critical care cardiology: transformation of the cardiovascular intensive care unit and the emerging need for new medical staffing and training models: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2012; 126:1408–1428. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826890b0LinkGoogle Scholar3. Berg DD, Barnett CF, Kenigsberg BB, et al. Clinical practice patterns in temporary mechanical circulatory support for shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.Circ Heart Fail. 2019; 12:e006635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006635LinkGoogle Scholar4. Geller BJ, Sinha SS, Kapur NK, et al. Escalating and de-escalating temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2022; 146:e50–e68. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001076LinkGoogle Scholar5. Papolos AI, Kenigsberg BB, Berg DD, et al; Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Investigators. Management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in cardiac ICUs with versus without shock teams.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021; 78:1309–1317. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.044CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar eLetters(0)eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.Sign In to Submit a Response to This Article Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails May 30, 2023Vol 147, Issue 22 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2023 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060802PMID: 37253080 Originally publishedMay 30, 2023 Keywordscritical carecardiogenic shockclinical trialPDF download Advertisement SubjectsCardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac CareClinical StudiesQuality and Outcomes