Evaluation of four laboratory-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 automated antigen tests compared to RT-PCR on nasal and oropharyngeal samples.

Thomas Daell Leineweber,Khaled Ghathian,Jan Gorm Lisby,Lennart Friis-Hansen,Shoaib Afzal,Svend Ellermann-Eriksen, Chih Man German Ma,Arieh S Cohen,Rikke Lind Jørgensen,Matilde Bøgelund Hansen, Pia Rørbæk Kamstrup,Helene Larsen,Nina Steenhard,Christel Barker Jensen, Thomas Kallemose, Maria Wendelboe Forsberg,Nikolai Søren Kirkby,Uffe Vest Schneider

Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology（2023）

引用 1|浏览7

暂无评分

摘要

All AATs were highly specific for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Three of the four AATs were significantly more sensitive than the fourth AAT both in terms of analytical and clinical sensitivity. Anatomical test location significantly influenced the clinical sensitivity of AATs.

查看译文

关键词

antigen tests,oropharyngeal samples,laboratory-based,high-throughput,sars-cov,rt-pcr

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要