Value of Cardiac Cine MRI in Comparison to Contrast Transcranial Doppler Sonography for Patent Foramen Ovale Assessment in Patients with Cerebral Disorders

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the clinical feasibility of diagnosing and classifying patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cerebral disorders by cardiac cine MRI (CCMRI) without contrast.Materials and Methods: Forty-four patients (24 males and 20 females; mean age, 41.3 years; range, 21–64 years) with cerebral disorders underwent contrast transcranial Doppler sonography (cTCD) and non-enhanced CCMRI examinations between October 2019 and March 2020. CCMRI was performed with a 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner using the OBL FIESTA CINE 4CH sequence. The scanning direction was perpendicular to the interatrial septum (IAS). The obtained MR images were analyzed by AW station 4.4. Pseudo-color coding was performed based on the different phases. The blood shunt condition was observed and recorded, noting the PFO length and width and whether it was complicated by IAS aneurysm or secondary septum thickening.Results: Thirty-nine of the 44 patients with cerebral disorders were confirmed to have right-to-left shunt by cTCD, and 37 of them were diagnosed with PFO by CCMRI. Two of the five remaining patients were also diagnosed with PFO by CCMRI. Compared with cTCD as a standard, CCMRI assessment resulted in the following: sensitivity, 94.9%; specificity, 60.0%; accuracy, 90.9%; positive predictive value, 94.9%; negative predictive value, 60.0%; area under the curve, 0.774. Using pseudo-color coding, a right-to-left color jet was observed in 34 patients, and a two-way shunt was found in five. IAS aneurysm and secondary septum thickening were found in five and three patients (11.4% and 6.8%), respectively. The maximum PFO diameters ranged from 1.7 to 16.8 mm, and the mean diameter was 5.4 ± 3.4 mm.Conclusion: The noninvasive CCMRI without contrast proved an excellent method for PFO identification, evaluation, and classification, with high sensibility (92.85%) and concordance (90.9%) compared to cTCD.