Channel-flow induced ‘normal faulting’ in the Himalaya: a case study from the Jhala Normal Fault, Garhwal Higher Himalaya, NW India

<p>The &#8216;channel flow&#8217; concept is generally associated with the collisional mountain belts (such as the Himalaya) to explain the exhumation of deeper crustal materials. According to the concept, the top part of the subducting plate gets &#8216;molten&#8217; and tries to return to the surface following the &#8216;pipe flow&#8217; mechanism via a combination of Poiseuille- and Couette Flows. In this study, we employed these concepts to address a long-standing debate related to the existence and cryptic nature (normal/ reverse) of an orogen parallel discontinuity, named the Jhala Normal Fault (JNF) present in the Bhagirathi River section of the Garhwal Higher Himalaya. More importantly, while a group of researchers consider the JNF to be the northern boundary of the Higher Himalayan channel (i.e., the South Tibetan Detachment System), another group put the JNF well inside the channel. In this scenario, understanding the mechanism of deformation at the JNF will not only solve this local issue but will also provide us with new insights into the geodynamic evolution of an orogeny. Based on fresh field observations and SHRIMP geochronological data (zircon and monazite), a model is being proposed in the current study to explain the origin and evolution of the JNF. The presence of amphibolite-grade rocks across the JNF, along with the lack of well-developed extensional markers, confirm that the fault is located within the Higher Himalayan channel, and not at the channel boundary. The U-Pb zircon rim ages of 33.8 &#177; 0.8 Ma and 30.7 &#177; 0.5 Ma obtained from the JNF hanging wall (northern block) and footwall (southern block), respectively, are considered as the ages of peak metamorphism. The hanging wall, which was present at the slow-moving marginal part of the channel during Eocene, eventually lagged behind the relatively faster and warmer central part. As a result, the footwall (southern) block experienced a faster exhumation, resulting in normal-sense movement along the JNF, as documented by sparse extension markers. At 21.4 &#177; 2.3 Ma (monazite U-Pb age), tourmaline-bearing leucogranite intruded in the JNF hanging wall, rupturing the host. This indicates the passive uplift of the JNF hanging wall (in a brittle domain) as a part of the Higher Himalaya. Hence the JNF originated as an intra-channel discontinuity, and our proposed model predicts the origin of a &#8216;normal fault&#8217; during crustal channel flow.</p>