Athero: an observational cross-sectional evaluation of atherosclerotic risk control in the belgian population treated with at least one antihypertensive and one lipid-lowering drug

Objective: To evaluate real-life lipid and blood pressure (BP) control in a contemporary Belgian population sample treated with at least one lipid-lowering and one antihypertensive drug. Design and method: Data was collected through GP questionnaires on 2337 subjects (ATHERO STUDY). Results: A complete set of relevant clinical variables was available for 1706 subjects (61.5% men; mean age 67.9 ± 10.9 years; mean BMI 28.4 ± 4.9 kg/m2), in which CVD, CAD, DM and renal insufficiency were reported respectively in 34.0%; 22.2%, 37.5% and 6.6% of cases. Based on the 2016 EAS/ESC guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias, 68.8% of subjects were classified as very high risk (VHR) and 10.9% as high-risk (HR). Despite the majority (almost 70%) taking > 1 antihypertensive drug, BP was uncontrolled in 44.0% (using the 140/90 mmHg threshold), without clear differences in control across risk strata. Treatment targets from the 2016 LDL-cholesterol guidelines were met in only 24.4% of VHR and 45.7% of HR subjects. For the new LDL-cholesterol targets 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias (which came after the data collection) this would be 10.1% and 11.7%% respectively. GP’s estimated adequate BP control in 69.2% and LDL-cholesterol control in 63.4% of cases. Combined BP and LDL-cholesterol control was achieved in 16.1% of VHR and 26.9% of HR subjects. In the VHR group there was a clear gender disparity (11.7% of women compared to 18.6% of men) in achieving adequate combined control. More striking, combined control in those VHR subjects with a clinical condition (1040/1174 subjects) was 17.9% whilst in those with VHR due to risk factor combinations this was only 2.2%. Use of combination lipid-lowering and antihypertensive drug combinations was low (1.8%) whilst 66.5% of subjects were potential candidates. Conclusions: In GP practices, target achievement was very low for BP and even more so for LDL-cholesterol prevention targets amongst VHR patients, especially in those associated to risk factor combinations rather than more easily recognizable clinical conditions. There was a clear disparity between GPs’ estimates of risk factor control/target achievement and real-life figures in GP practices.