Prospective Observational Study of Pain Severity and Pain Interference Outcomes Following Percutaneous MRI-guided Laser Ablation or Cryoablation for Focal Painful Peripheral, Soft Tissue Vascular Malformations: 12-month Outcomes

Background: Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation has emerged as a treatment option for vascular malformations (VM). However, prospective data on intermediate to long-term effectiveness with uniform follow-up are lacking. Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the 12-month pain severity and pain interference outcomes following percutaneous MRI-guided laser ablation and cryoablation of focal painful, peripheral soft tissue VM. Materials and Methods: Participants undergoing clinically indicated MRI-guided laser ablation and cryoablation for focal painful (worst pain ≥4 out of 10 on Visual Analog Scale), peripheral soft tissue vascular malformations (VM) were enrolled in an IRB-approved prospective, observational study after giving informed consent. Participants completed the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire prior to ablation and 1, 3, 6, and 12-month postablation. Differences in pain severity and interference outcomes from baseline on a 0 to 10 scale were compared using a paired t-test. Results: Seventeen participants (15 female; mean age 28.3 ± 9.3 years) underwent 24 MRI-guided and monitored ablation sessions including laser (n = 21), cryoablation (n = 2), or both (n = 1) for treatment of painful slow-flow (n = 16) or high-flow (n = 1) VM. Median maximal VM diameter was 5.7 cm (range 1.1 to 31.0 cm). Mean (±SD) preablation worst pain score was 7.9 ± 1.4. There was a significant decrease in worst pain at 1-month postablation (–3.5 ± 2.9; P = .0007) that was sustained at 3 (–3.4 ± 3.2; P = .0007), 6 (–4.2 ± 3.6; P = .0003), and 12 months (–3.6 ± 3.9; P = .002), with similar results for average, current, and least pain scores. There was a significant improvement in pain interference outcomes at 12-month postablation: general activity ( P = .018), walking ability ( P = .008), work ( P = .003), sleep ( P = .007), and enjoyment of life ( P = .033). Conclusions: These data suggest that MRI-guided and monitored thermal ablation is safe and provides early and sustained significant improvements in pain severity and pain interference outcomes during the first year of follow-up in participants with focal painful peripheral soft tissue VM.