Abstract No. 94 Extended 5-Year Amputation and Survival Outcomes from SINGAPACLI: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Drug-Coated Balloon to Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Below-the-Knee Arteries in Critical Limb Ischemia

K. Zhuang, A. Patel, E. Chong,S. Chan, H. Win, Z. Tan, T. Hon, F. Irani, A. Gogna, M. Chua, S. Leong, C. Sivanathan,K. Tay, T. Chong,B. Tan

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
The Singapore Infra-Genicular Angioplasty with Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon for Critical Limb Ischemia (SINGA-PACLI) trial is a randomized clinical trial comparing drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) to conventional (uncoated) percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for below-the-knee (BTK) lesions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. We sought to assess the long-term safety outcomes of the SINGA-PACLI trial by analyzing the 5-year freedom from major amputation, survival and amputation-free survival (no amputation or death) in trial participants. The SINGA-PACLI trial recruited and randomized 138 participants across two centers in a 1:1 ratio to either DCBA or PTA treatment. After obtaining additional consent for study period extension to 5 years (beyond the original 1-year follow-up), 112 participants were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. There was no significant difference between both groups for freedom from major amputation (DBCA vs PTA: 70.8% vs 79.7%, logrank P = 0.43; HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.61–3.16), survival (DBCA vs PTA: 37.5% vs 42.3%, log-rank P = 0.69; HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.65–1.91) and amputation-free survival (DBCA vs PTA: 32.9% vs 40.0%, log-rank P = 0.29; HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.79–2.17) at 5-year follow-up. There was no significant difference in the risk of death and major amputation between the DCBA and PTA arms in the SINGA-PACLI trial at 5 years follow-up.
更多
查看译文
关键词
conventional balloon angioplasty,singapacli,survival outcomes,drug-coated,below-the-knee
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要