Abstract P6-01-22: Age, Ki-67, Nodal pCR and overall survival following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node Positive ER+/Her2- Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: The role of chemotherapy in node positive (N+) luminal breast cancer (BC) is often debated, given low total pathologic complete response (pCR) rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and discrepancy in adjuvant chemotherapy benefit. A prior single institution study of cN+ luminal BC showed that pts age < 50 and tumor Ki-67 ≥ 20% had high nodal pCR (> 35%). This study’s goals were 1) to validate Ki-67 and age in relation to nodal pCR and 2) evaluate the prognostic impact of nodal pCR on overall survival (OS). Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database 2010-2019 for pts with cN+ ER+/HER2- BC treated with NAC and surgery. Breast pCR was defined as ypT0/ypTis and nodal pCR as ypN0/ypN0i+. Ki-67 was available in 2018 & 2019 only and was used to evaluate Ki-67 and nodal pCR. 2010-2018 data were used to evaluate nodal pCR and OS. OS was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: In 2018-2019, 4,801 pts were identified and 2,473 (51.5%) had Ki-67 available. Nodal pCR was 23.7% and was higher in pts < 50 years old (28.1% vs 21.1%) and in those with Ki67 ≥ 20% (28.4% vs 12.7%), both p < 0.001. Pts < 50 with Ki67 ≥ 20% had the highest nodal pCR at 31.7%, followed by age ≥ 50 with Ki67 ≥ 20% at 26.3%. With Ki67 < 20%, nodal pCR was 15.4% (in age < 50) and 11.3% (in age ≥ 50). From 2010-2018, we identified 20,084 cN+ ER+/HER2- BC pts treated with NAC. Total pCR was 7.4%, 14.3% had nodal pCR only, 3.8% had breast pCR only, and 74.5% had residual disease in breast and nodes. OS at 5 years was 79.1% and varied by NAC response: 90.8% with total pCR, 83.8% with nodal pCR only, 80.7% with breast pCR only, and 76.9% with residual disease in breast and nodes. Specifically nodal pCR (with or without breast pCR) was seen in 22.0% and was associated with 5-year OS rate of 86.4% compared to 77.1% without nodal pCR, p < 0.001. On multivariable analysis adjusted for other clinical and treatment factors, nodal pCR was associated with better OS (adjusted HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.50-0.61, p < 0.001) in all ages combined and within both the age < 50 and age ≥ 50 subgroups (see Table). In a subgroup of pts approximating RxPonder entry criteria (defined as cT1-3, N1, Grade I or II, ER+/PR+), results were consistent with the overall cohort: nodal pCR varied by both age (17.5% in age < 50 and 13.6% in age ≥ 50, p < 0.001) and by Ki67 ≥ 20% vs < 20% (16.8% vs 7.9%, p < 0.001) and nodal pCR remained prognostic for OS with adjusted HR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.50-0.81, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In cN+ ER+/HER2- BC treated with NAC, nodal pCR is more common in pts< 50 and those with high Ki-67 and is highly prognostic for OS. These data strongly suggest that NAC chemotherapy benefit should not be evaluated using total pCR rates in isolation, but for N+ pts to also consider nodal response. Given that nodal pCR is highly prognostic for OS, future neoadjuvant strategies should consider nodal pCR as a potential intermediate biomarker for long term survival. Multivariable analysis of factors associated with overall survival, including the adjusted effect of nodal pCR Citation Format: Dan Moldoveanu, Matthew P. Goetz, Tanya L. Hoskin, Courtney N. Day, Judy C. Boughey. Age, Ki-67, Nodal pCR and overall survival following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node Positive ER+/Her2- Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-01-22.