Ileal conduit versus single stoma uretero-cutanoustomy after radical cystectomy in patients ≥ 75 years; which technique is better? a prospective randomized comparative study

Purpose To compare the clinical results and patients’ health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) of ileal conduit (IC) versus single stoma uretero-cutanoustomy (SSUC) after radical cystectomy in two groups of randomly selected patients ≥ 75 years. Methods From January 2013 to March 2018, 100 patients ≥ 75 years with muscle invasive BCa underwent RCX and cutaneous diversion. Patients were divided in two groups; group I underwent IC (50 patients) and group II underwent SSUC (50 patients). Postoperative evaluation included clinical, laboratory, radiographic and HR-QoL. The latter was performed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Bladder Cancer (FACT-BL) after 12 months postoperatively. Results Patients’ characteristics were comparable between both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred. Early postoperative complications occurred in 27 patients [16 (35.5%) in group I and 11 (23.9%) in group II (p = 0.02)]. Delayed postoperative complications occurred in 26 patients [6 (13.3%) in group I and 20 (43.4%) in group II, (P = 0.002)]. No significant differences between both groups regarding the physical, social/family, emotional, functional and additional concerns scales of FACT-BL questionnaire were reported. Conclusion SSUC is a good alternative to IC in elderly frail patients ≥ 75 years and those with multiple comorbidities who require rapid surgery in terms of perioperative complications and HR-QoL. However, the stomal complications and the possibility of a frequent stent exchange are considered its drawbacks.