Mothership vs. drip-and-ship: evaluation of initial treatment strategies for acute ischemic stroke in a well-developed network of specialized hospitals

PurposeTwo strategies of initial patient care exist in endovascular thrombectomy (ET) depending on the site of initial admission: the mothership (MS) and drip-and-ship (DnS) principles. This study compares both strategies in regard to patient outcome in a local network of specialized hospitals.MethodsTwo-hundred-and-two patients undergoing ET in anterior circulation ischemic stroke between June 2016 and May 2018 were enrolled. Ninety two patients were directly admitted to our local facility (MS), One-hundred-and-ten were secondarily referred to our facility. Group comparisons between admission strategies in three-months modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Maas Score and Alberta-Stroke-Program-Early-computed-tomography-score (ASPECTS), National-Institutes-of-Health-Stroke-Scale (NIHSS), age and onset-to-recanalization-time were performed. Correlation between admission strategy and mRS was calculated. A binary logistic regression model was computed including mRS as dependent variable.ResultsThere were neither significant group differences in three-months mRS between MS and DnS nor significant correlations. Patients tended to achieve a better outcome with DnS. Collateralization status differed between MS and DnS (p = 0.003) with better collateralization in DnS. There were no significant group differences in NIHSS or ASPECTS but in onset-to-recanalization-time (p < 0.001) between MS and DnS. Binary logistic regression showed a high explanation of variance of mRS but no significant results for admission strategy.ConclusionsFunctional outcome in patients treated with ET is comparable between the MS and DnS principles. Tendentially better outcome in the DnS subgroup may be explained by selection bias due to a higher willingness to apply ET in patients with worse baseline conditions (e.g. worse collateralization), if patients undergoing MS are already on site.