A generic, scalable, and rapid TR-FRET –based assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has seen an unprecedented increase in the demand for rapid and reliable diagnostic tools, leaving many laboratories scrambling for resources. We present a fast and simple method for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs. The method is based on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (NP) and S protein (SP) via time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) with donor- and acceptor-labeled polyclonal anti-NP and -SP antibodies. Using recombinant proteins and cell culture-grown SARS-CoV-2 the limits of detection were established as 25 pg of NP or 20 infectious viral units (i.u.), and 875 pg of SP or 625 i.u. of SARS-CoV-2. Testing RT-PCR positive (n=48, with cycle threshold [Ct] values from 11 to 30) or negative (n=96) nasopharyngeal swabs, we showed that the assay yields positive results for all samples with Ct values of <25 and a single RT-PCR negative sample. We determined the presence of infectious virus in the RT-PCR-positive nasopharyngeal swabs by virus isolation, and observed a strong association between the presence of infectious virus and a positive antigen test result. The NP-based assay showed 97.4% (37/38) sensitivity and 100% (10/10) specificity in comparison with virus isolation, and 77.1% (37/48) and 99.0% (95/96) in comparison with SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. The assay is performed in a buffer that neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and is relatively simple to set up as an “in-house” test. The assay principle as such is applicable to other viral infections, and could also be readily adapted to a massively high throughput testing format. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement The study was supported by Academy of Finland (grants 308613, 314119, and 335762 to JH), the funder(s) had no role in study design or interpretation of the results. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Patient data were collected and samples handled according to research permit approved by the local review board, permit HUS/32/2018 (Helsinki University Hospital, Finland). All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable. Yes The data referred to in the manuscript is either provided as supplementary material or upon request.