Lowering of circulating sclerostin may increase risk of atherosclerosis and its risk factors: evidence from a genome-wide association meta-analysis followed by Mendelian randomization

Sclerostin inhibition is a new therapeutic approach for increasing bone mineral density (BMD) but its cardiovascular safety is unclear. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of circulating sclerostin in 33,961 Europeans followed by Mendelian randomization (MR) to estimate the causal effects of sclerostin on 15 atherosclerosis-related diseases and risk factors. GWAS meta-analysis identified 18 variants independently associated with sclerostin, which including a novel cis signal in the SOST region and three trans signals in B4GALNT3, RIN3 and SERPINA1 regions that were associated with opposite effects on circulating sclerostin and eBMD. MR combining these four SNPs suggested lower sclerostin increased hypertension risk (odds ratio [OR]=1.09, 95%CI=1.04 to 1.15), whereas bi-directional analyses revealed little evidence for an effect of genetic liability to hypertension on sclerostin levels. MR restricted to cis (SOST) SNPs additionally suggested sclerostin inhibition increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) (OR=1.26; 95%CI=1.08 to 1.48) and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.183 to 1.45). Furthermore, these analyses suggested sclerostin inhibition increased coronary artery calcification (CAC) (β=0.74, 95%CI=0.33 to 1.15), levels of apoB (β=0.07; 95%CI=0.04 to 0.10; this result was driven by rs4793023) and triglycerides (β=0.18; 95%CI=0.13 to 0.24), and reduced HDL-C (β=-0.14; 95%CI=-0.17 to -0.10). This study provides genetic evidence to support a causal effect of sclerostin inhibition on increased hypertension risk. Cis -only analyses suggested that sclerostin inhibition additionally increases the risk of T2DM, MI, CAC, and an atherogenic lipid profile. Together, our findings reinforce the requirement for strategies to mitigate against adverse effects of sclerostin inhibitors like romosozumab on atherosclerosis and its related risk factors. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement ALSPAC data collection was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grants WT092830M; WT088806; WT102215/2/13/2), UK Medical Research Council (G1001357), and University of Bristol. The UK Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust (ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. GDS works in the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol MC\_UU\_00011/1. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript