Validation of the Chinese DeFeC questionnaire: a comprehensive screening tool for symptoms and causes of constipation and incontinence.

BACKGROUND:Currently, the diagnosis of defecation disorders in China is usually based on varied and ambiguous criteria. We aimed to translate the Groningen Defecation and Fecal Continence (DeFeC) questionnaire to Chinese and test its reproducibility and feasibility in the general Chinese population. METHODS:The Groningen Defecation Questionnaire was translated into Chinese according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). The feasibility and reproducibility were evaluated by performing a test-retest online survey and calculating the Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient [or intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)], with 0.01-0.20 considered slight agreement; 0.21-0.40, fair agreement; 0.41-0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61-0.80, substantial agreement; and 0.81-1.00, almost perfect agreement. RESULTS:In total, 130 respondents completed the questionnaire twice, with a mean age of 47.08±12.46 years. No remarks were made that indicted that the questions were difficult to understand. The median time to complete the questionnaire was 20.78 min [interquartile range (IQR), 14.83-29.20 min] for the first time. The κ coefficient of all defecation function-related domains ranged between 0.25 and 0.71, with an average value of 0.53. The constipation and fecal incontinence-related domains showed a substantial and moderate agreement level, as indicated by κ of 0.65 and 0.52, respectively. The Agachan constipation score and Wexner incontinence score showed perfect and substantial agreement, as indicated by an ICC of 0.88 and 0.74, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:The Chinese version of the Groningen DeFeC questionnaire is highly feasible and reproducible and can be applied in clinical and research activities for the Chinese population.