Utility of Direct Specimen Sequencing in Addition to Conventional Testing in Management of Infections in an Urban Referral Health Center

Background Direct specimen sequencing (DSS) offers the promise of enhanced pathogen detection and disease diagnosis. Methods A single healthcare network, retrospective chart review over a 3-year period was completed for all cases in which DSS was submitted, in addition to conventional testing (CT) for workup of an infectious disease. We sought to compare results (concordance and discordance) from these 2 techniques in order to evaluate any additional yield from DSS over CT. Additionally, we calculated mean turnaround time (TAT) and average cost for obtaining DSS on all specimens. Results A total of 23 patients' specimens were sent for DSS. DSS and CT concordance occurred in 91% (21/23) of cases. DSS testing was able to identify specific pathogens in 17.4% (4/23) of patients, out of which 4% (1/23) were discordant. The respective mean TAT and total cost per specimen for DSS were 6 days and $821.52 (range $573-$1590), respectively. Conclusions In our limited cohort of patients, there was significant concordance between the 2 testing modalities primarily due to negative tests. DSS did not provide significant additional yield in the infectious diagnosis in our cohort compared to CT. Short TAT may provide advantage in the detection of fastidious organisms, but high cost remains a limitation. Larger sample size may reveal a clinically meaningful difference.