A Comparison of Value-Weight-Elicitation Methods for Accurate and Accessible Participatory Planning
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH(2023)
摘要
This research analyzed six value-weight-elicitation techniques that are commonly used in participatory planning. It compared the techniques via measures of (1) accuracy (within-subjects user-derived assessments and quantitative weight comparisons) and (2) accessibility (time to complete, difficulty, and "boringness"). Visual sliders performed best across assessments. Pairwise comparison, visual sliders, and swing weighting were the most accurate, while visual sliders and vertical visual scale were the most accessible. Point allocation and the popular Likert-type method performed poorly across assessments. All methods produced similar weights, highlighting the importance of accessibility when choosing scales. This research can inform participatory planning and survey design techniques.
更多查看译文
关键词
value weight elicitation,public engagement methods,planning,decision making,trade-offs,accuracy,accessibility,survey design,participation
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要