Revisiting dynamic range and image enhancement ability of contemporary digital radiographic systems-part 2: a subjective assessment.

OBJECTIVE:To assess the subjective image quality of original and manually enhanced radiographs acquired at different X-ray exposure times and using different digital systems. METHODS:A total of 500 radiographs obtained under 10 exposure times, 5 digital systems, and 2 enhancement conditions were assessed by 5 observers, who were asked to categorize each radiograph into acceptable or unacceptable. A radiograph was considered to be acceptable when at least four out of five observers found it acceptable. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize the outcomes and compare the subjective image quality of original and manually enhanced digital radiographs among different X-ray exposure times and digital systems. RESULTS:Express had six exposure times producing acceptable original images within a range from 0.063 to 0.4 s, followed by Digora Toto, which had five within a range from 0.063 to 0.32 s, Digora Optime, which had four within a range from 0.063 to 0.2 s,and SnapShot and VistaScan, which had 2 (0.2 and 0.32 s) and 1 (0.63 s), respectively. Image enhancement turned unacceptable images into acceptable ones in four digital systems: SnapShot at three exposure times, Digora Toto at two exposure times, Express at one exposure time, and VistaScan at four exposure times. CONCLUSION:Image enhancement based on brightness and/or contrast adjustments may be necessary to reveal the useful dynamic range of some digital radiographic systems and PSP-based systems may not necessarily have a wider range than sensor-based systems.