TimeTeller: A tool to probe the circadian clock as a multigene dynamical system

Recent studies have established that the circadian clock influences onset, progression and therapeutic outcomes in a number of diseases including cancer and heart diseases. Therefore, there is a need for tools to measure the functional state of the molecular circadian clock and its downstream targets in patients. Moreover, the clock is a multi-dimensional stochastic oscillator and there are few tools for analysing it as a noisy multigene dynamical system. In this paper we consider the methodology behind TimeTeller, a machine learning tool that analyses the clock as a noisy multigene dynamical system and aims to estimate circadian clock function from a single transcriptome by modelling the multi-dimensional state of the clock. We demonstrate its potential for clock systems assessment by applying it to mouse, baboon and human microarray and RNA-seq data and show how to visualise and quantify the global structure of the clock, quantitatively stratify individual transcriptomic samples by clock dysfunction and globally compare clocks across individuals, conditions and tissues thus highlighting its potential relevance for advancing circadian medicine. The cellular circadian clock consists of an interacting set of genes that through their interactions oscillate throughout the day. This oscillator also responds to external cues so that the genes oscillate in phase with external environmental rhythms. A cell therefore uses its circadian clock to provide its genes with information about the external time. In this way it can coordinate many of the processes taking place in the cell and allocate some of these processes to specific times of the day. It is becoming increasingly clear that the quality of this timing information influences onset progression and outcome in a number of chronic diseases such as cancer. Our aim is therefore to develop a machine-learning tool that can assess how well the clock is working. We want to use this with patients and therefore, for clinical utility, it needs to work with only a single clinical sample and to produce reproducible results that can be clearly interpreted and easily compared.