Misinterpretation in microplastic detection in biological tissues: When 2D imaging is not enough.

The presence of microplastics in the food chain is a public concern worldwide, and its analysis is an analytical challenge. In our research, we apply Raman imaging to study the presence of 1 μm polystyrene microplastics in cryosections of Mytilus galloprovincialis due to its wide geographic distribution, widespread occurrence in the food web, and general high presence in the environment. Ingested microplastics are accumulated in the digestive tract, but a large number can also be rapidly eliminated. Some authors state that the translocation of microplastics to the epithelial cells is possible, increasing the risk of microplastics transmission along the food chain. However, as seen in our study, a surface imaging approach (2D) is probably not enough to confirm the internalization of particles and avoid misinterpretation. In fact, while some microplastic particles were detected in the epithelium by 2D Raman imaging, further 3D Raman imaging analysis demonstrated that those particles were dragged from the lumens to the epithelium during sample preparation due to the blade drag effect of the cryotome, and subsequently located on the surface of the analyzed cryosection, discarding the translocation to the epithelial cells. This effect can also happen when the samples are fortuitously contaminated during sample preparation. Several research articles that use similar analytical techniques have shown the presence of microplastics in different types of tissue. It is not our intention to put such results in doubt, but the present work points out the necessity of appropriate three-dimensional analytical methods including data interpretation and the need to go a step further than just surface imaging analysis.