Quantification of Aquarius, SMAP, SMOS and Argo-Based Gridded Sea Surface Salinity Product Sampling Errors.

Evaluating and validating satellite sea surface salinity (SSS) measurements is fundamental. There are two types of errors in satellite SSS: measurement error due to the instrument's inaccuracy and problems in retrieval, and sampling error due to unrepresentativeness in the way that the sea surface is sampled in time and space by the instrument. In this study, we focus on sampling errors, which impact both satellite and in situ products. We estimate the sampling errors of Level 3 satellite SSS products from Aquarius, SMOS and SMAP, and in situ gridded products. To do that, we use simulated L2 and L3 Aquarius, SMAP and SMOS SSS data, individual Argo observations and gridded Argo products derived from a 12-month high-resolution 1/48 degrees ocean model. The use of the simulated data allows us to quantify the sampling error and eliminate the measurement error. We found that the sampling errors are high in regions of high SSS variability and are globally about 0.02/0.03 psu at weekly time scales and 0.01/0.02 psu at monthly time scales for satellite products. The in situ-based product sampling error is significantly higher than that of the three satellite products at monthly scales (0.085 psu) indicating the need to be cautious when using in situ-based gridded products to validate satellite products. Similar results are found using a Correlated Triple Collocation method that quantifies the standard deviation of products' errors acquired with different instruments. By improving our understanding and quantifying the effect of sampling errors on satellite-in situ SSS consistency over various spatial and temporal scales, this study will help to improve the validation of SSS, the robustness of scientific applications and the design of future salinity missions.