Novel chairside spectrometer-trained system for measuring the irradiance of light-curing units.

Douglas C Holmes,Wen Lien,Christopher J Raimondi, Wyeth L Hoopes,Kraig S Vandewalle

General dentistry(2023)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the performances of 5 different instruments in measuring the irradiance of light-curing units (LCUs). A novel spectrometer-trained radiometer (CheckUp), 2 conventional chairside radiometers (Bluephase Meter I and Bluephase Meter II), and 2 devices considered to be gold standards for measuring irradiance (an integrating sphere spectrometer and a thermopile sensor) were used to evaluate 7 LCUs. The irradiance of each LCU was measured 10 times with each meter. Data were analyzed using linear regression analysis and a 1-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05). The mean irradiance values of the LCUs differed significantly depending on which meter was used for measurement (P < 0.05). Bivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the highest correlations in the irradiance values were found between the CheckUp meter and both the integrating sphere (r = 0.980) and the thermopile (r = 0.933). The absolute mean (SD) percentage deviation between irradiance measured by the CheckUp instrument and irradiance measured by the other meters was 7.2% (2.0%) for the integrating sphere, 7.0% (3.6%) for the thermopile, 21.5% (16.1%) for Bluephase Meter I, and 13.1% (7.1%) for Bluephase Meter II. Compared with the 2 conventional chairside radiometers, the CheckUp meter provided the highest correlation with and lowest absolute percentage deviation from the irradiance measured by the gold standard spectrometers.
更多
查看译文
关键词
dental curing lights,irradiance,radiometry,regression analysis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要