Identifiability of soft tissue constitutive parameters from in-vivo macro-indentation

Reliable identification of soft tissue material parameters is frequently required in a variety of applications, particularly for biomechanical simulations using finite element analysis (FEA). However, determining repre-sentative constitutive laws and material parameters is challenging and often comprises a bottleneck that hinders the successful implementation of FEA. Soft tissues exhibit a nonlinear response and are commonly modeled using hyperelastic constitutive laws. In-vivo material parameter identification, for which standard mechanical tests (e. g., uniaxial tension and compression) are inapplicable, is commonly achieved using finite macro-indentation test. Due to the lack of analytical solutions, the parameters are commonly identified using inverse FEA (iFEA), in which simulated results and experimental data are iteratively compared. However, determining what data must be collected to accurately identify a unique parameter set remains unclear. This work investigates the sensitivities of two types of measurements: indentation force-depth data (e.g., measured using an instrumented indenter) and full-field surface displacements (e.g., using digital image correlation). To eliminate model fidelity and measurement-related errors, we employed an axisymmetric indentation FE model to produce synthetic data for four 2-parameter hyperelastic constitutive laws: compressible Neo-Hookean, and nearly incompressible Mooney-Rivlin, Ogden, and Ogden-Moerman models. For each constitutive law, we computed the objective functions representing the discrepancies in the reaction force, the surface displacement, and their combination, and visualized them for hundreds of parameter sets, spanning a representative range as found in the literature for the bulk soft tissue complex in human lower limbs. Moreover, we quantified three identifiability metrics, which provided insights into the uniqueness (or lack thereof) and the sensitivities. This approach provides a clear and systematic evaluation of the parameter identifiability, which is independent of the selection of the optimization algorithm and initial guesses required in iFEA. Our analysis indicated that the indenter's force-depth data, despite being commonly used for parameter identification, was insufficient for reliably and accurately identi-fying both parameters for all the investigated material models and that the surface displacement data improved the parameter identifiability in all cases, although the Mooney-Rivlin parameters remained poorly identifiable. Informed by the results, we then discuss several identification strategies for each constitutive model. Finally, we openly provide the codes used in this study, to allow others to further investigate the indentation problem ac-cording to their specifications (e.g., by modifying the geometries, dimensions, mesh, material models, boundary conditions, contact parameters, or objective functions).