Learning curves and perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy on two different da Vinci ® surgical systems

This study aimed to report a single surgeon’s early experience and learning curves of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy on two different robotic surgical platforms, namely, the single-site approach on da Vinci Xi ® and single-port approach on da Vinci SP ® surgical systems. This retrospective study included 123 consecutive cases of robotic sacrocolpopexy performed between June 2017 and June 2021 for the patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage 2–4 symptomatic prolapse. First consecutive 57 cases were performed under the da Vinci Xi ® system applying the single-site manner, whereas the following 66 cases were done under the da Vinci SP ® system. The primary outcome was intraoperative and perioperative complication rates, and the secondary outcome was learning curve of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy under the two different robotic surgical platforms. Learning curves based on the operation time were obtained through cumulative sum analysis. The mean age of each group was 65.6 ± 8.7 years for single-site robotic sacrocolpopexy and 63.7 ± 7.6 years for the single-port one ( p = 0.202). More than 80% of patients for each group had advanced prolapse stages and underwent concomitant total hysterectomy. The overall baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. The median operation time for each group were 201.0 and 201.5 min, respectively. Both groups showed comparable perioperative outcomes in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Intraoperative cystostomy rates were 1.8% and 3.0%, respectively, and revealed no statistical difference ( p = 0.736). The learning curves were comparable, and the surgeon required less than 15 cases for both single-site and single-port robotic sacrocolpopexies to stabilize operation time. Comparable learning curves and favorable intraoperative and perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy using two different robotic surgical systems show that both are feasible options for robotic sacrocolpopexy.