Health Care Provider Decisions to Initiate Oral HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in New York City Public Sexual Health Clinics

BackgroundOral HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is safe and effective but underutilized. Health care providers' beliefs about PrEP and attitudes toward people who could benefit may affect PrEP access.MethodsThis mixed-methods study (2016-2018) was conducted in 8 New York City public sexual health clinics that implemented a PrEP program. Data included 32 in-depth qualitative interviews with clinicians, quantitatively coded to reflect their PrEP beliefs; a provider questionnaire; and 6 months of medical record visit data for these providers. Among patients with a PrEP indication, we examined the odds of a patient being initiated on PrEP associated with providers' PrEP beliefs and demographic characteristics, and patient characteristics.ResultsProviders reported strong support for offering PrEP to eligible patients. The majority denied concerns about possible development of drug-resistant viral strains, giving PrEP to people who might not benefit, and PrEP toxicity. Nevertheless, about one-third agreed with each of these concerns, and 55% thought PrEP use might limit condom use. Of 2176 patients with a PrEP indication, 20% were initiated. Providers with more restrictive PrEP beliefs did not have lower odds of initiating patients on PrEP. Women as well as Black and Latinx patients were less likely to be initiated on PrEP.ConclusionsContrary to our hypotheses, providers' negative PrEP beliefs did not seem to reduce initiation of PrEP for eligible patients. This may be attributable to clear clinical protocols, strong staff support, and training on implementing PrEP in this setting. Racial and gender disparities in PrEP uptake urgently require attention.