Effect of Cognitive Mental Load on Attended and Nonattended Visual Stimuli.

SIGNIFICANCE:In the real word, visual tasks may be concurrent with other activity that imposes mental load. Although the brain's capacity to process information is limited, attention can improve visual performance by selectively allocating processing resources. Therefore, measuring visual performance under such circumstances can reflect patients' vision more accurately. PURPOSE:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nonvisual task-induced mental load on visual performance at both attended and unattended locations in stimulus-driven captured attention. METHODS:Visual function was measured with an orientation discrimination task for Gabor patches with contrasts of 10, 15, 30, 50, and 80%. Three attentional conditions (valid-cue, invalid-cue, and neutral-cue) were randomly interleaved within runs. To modulate mental load, the visual task was performed either with or without a simultaneous auditory n-back task (two-back for maximum mental load and zero-back to control for the effect of having to perform a simultaneous task). RESULTS:Our result showed that the effect of mental load on correct responses was significant ( P = .02). Correct responses decreased significantly during the two-back task when compared with the baseline condition ( P = .03), but there was no significant difference between baseline and zero-back conditions ( P = .06). The effect of attention and spatial frequencies on the percentage of correct responses was significant ( P < .001). There was no significant interaction between mental load and spatial frequency, contrast level, or attention ( P > .05). CONCLUSIONS:Mental load had a similar decreasing effect on attended and unattended visual stimuli. This may be due to a generalized effect on processing resources upstream to where spatial attention is allocated.