Higher Dissatisfaction Rate Following Revision Compared With Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: 1-Year Follow-up of 2151 Primary and 235 Aseptic Revision Surgeries

Postoperative patient satisfaction is related to preoperative expectations. In-formation regarding expected results following surgery is therefore important. This study evaluated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient satisfaction up to 1 year after primary and aseptic revision total knee arthro-plasty (TKA). The study included 2151 primary and 235 aseptic revision TKA surgeries conducted between 2010 and 2018. Pain, Knee Injury and Osteoar-thritis Outcome Score-Physical Function-Short Form and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension surveys were recorded preoperatively and at 8 weeks and 1 year. To determine satisfaction, patients were asked to rate their knee function compared with that before surgery and to answer whether they would undergo the surgery again given their current knowledge. Patients who had primary TKA improved in all PROMs in each follow-up up to 1 year, whereas patients who had revision TKA showed improvement at 8 weeks with no further improve-ment at 1 year. In terms of patient satisfaction, 88% of patients in the primary TKA group reported better knee function, and 87% were willing to have the sur-gery again at 1 year; the proportions were lower for patients who underwent revision TKA (66% and 68%, respectively). Aseptic revision TKA demonstrates inferior PROMs compared with those of primary TKA 1 year after surgery, and more than 30% of the patients who underwent revision TKA stated that they would not have their TKA revised or were uncertain, given the outcome of the procedure. Thus, patients who are candidates for revision TKA should be in-formed to expect less of an improvement following revision surgery than with the primary TKA. Our findings can facilitate the shared decision-making pro-cess by surgeons and patients based on realistic expectations of surgical out-comes. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):e52-e57.]