Erratum to Is the Long-Term Probability of the Occurrence of Large Earthquakes along the Nankai Trough Inflated?—Scientific Review

Correction| October 19, 2022 Erratum to Is the Long‐Term Probability of the Occurrence of Large Earthquakes along the Nankai Trough Inflated?—Scientific Review Manabu Hashimoto Manabu Hashimoto * 1School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Saitama, Japan *Corresponding author: hashimoto@g.dendai.ac.jp https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-3531 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Manabu Hashimoto https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-3531 * 1School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Saitama, Japan *Corresponding author: hashimoto@g.dendai.ac.jp Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 19 Oct 2022 Online ISSN: 1938-2057 Print ISSN: 0895-0695 © Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (1): 555. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220311 Article history First Online: 19 Oct 2022 Connected Content Errata: Is the Long‐Term Probability of the Occurrence of Large Earthquakes along the Nankai Trough Inflated?—Scientific Review Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Manabu Hashimoto; Erratum to Is the Long‐Term Probability of the Occurrence of Large Earthquakes along the Nankai Trough Inflated?—Scientific Review. Seismological Research Letters 2022;; 94 (1): 555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220311 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search The unit of displacement in Figure 3 is incorrect. This figure shows cumulative uplift at the Cape Muroto and estimate recurrence interval of earthquake along the Nankai trough based on Shimazaki and Nakata (1980). The unit should be replaced by meters. In the original article Hashimoto (2021), coseismic uplift is correctly presented, and this correction does not affect the conclusion. The author regrets this error, and the complete figure can be found in the current version. The author acknowledges that there are no conflicts of interest recorded. View Original Article You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.