Temporal changes in aortic valve replacement according to age in Denmark: nationwide data from 2008 to 2020

Abstract Background Since the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the management of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis has changed. Recent published European guidelines (2021) favours TAVI over surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVR) in patients with older age (≥75 years of age) or patients with high surgical risk. The study of nationwide practice patterns for AVR is important and renders the possibility to evaluate whether clinical practice differs from current guidelines. Purpose To evaluate temporal changes in use of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) procedures according to age in the era of TAVI in Denmark. Methods We identified all first-time aortic valve replacement procedures (TAVI or SAVR) from 2008 until the end of 2020 through administrative registries in Denmark. Patients with no prior diagnosis of aortic stenosis at time of AVR were excluded. Patients with prior AVR or valve repair were excluded. SAVR was divided according to type of prostheses: surgical bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. To evaluate changes according to age the study cohort was divided into two age groups: <75 and ≥75 years of age. Results Between 2008 and 2020, 12,313 first-time isolated AVR procedures were performed in Denmark. Volume of isolated AVR increased from 621 to 1256 procedures per year (ptrend <0.001). Isolated SAVR was performed in 6,548 patients (53.2%) and TAVI in 5,765 patients (46.8%). Median age of TAVI patients was 81.4 [76.9–85.2] years of age compared to 73.1 [68.0-≥77.7] in patients receiving surgical bioprostheses and TAVI patients had a higher degree of comorbidity (TAVI: 70% of patients with Charlson comorbidity score ≥1, surgical bioprostheses: 50% of patients with Charlson comorbidty score ≥1). TAVI increased during study period compared to isolated SAVR, where a decreasing trend was observed from 2014 and onwards. In <75-year-old patients, volume of TAVI significantly increased during study period (ptrend<0.001), whereas volume of surgical bioprostheses remained stable. Volume of mechanical prostheses decreased over time (ptrend <0.001) TAVI increased in ≥75-year-old patients (ptrend <0.001) and TAVI accounted for 91.5% of all isolated AVR procedures in 2020. In contrast, volume of isolated SAVR declined driven by a decreasing use of surgical bioprostheses (ptrend=0.001). (Figure 1). Conclusions Volume of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) doubled from 2008 and 2020. The increase in isolated AVR was driven by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). TAVI has become the predominant choice of isolated AVR in management of aortic stenosis and our results suggest that real-world practise patterns are in line with current guideline recommendations. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.