Racial/ethnic disparities in serious illness communication for patients with cancer.

6540 Background: Racial/ethnic disparities in serious illness communication exist between patients with cancer and their oncologists. Our prior work has shown that goals of care discussions are three minutes shorter with racial/ethnic minority patients. In this study, we sought to compare oncologist's use of serious illness communication skills, patient participatory behavior, and overall communication quality during encounters with patients with advanced cancer of different self-reported races/ethnicities. Methods: We analyzed baseline recordings from a two-arm multisite randomized controlled trial to test a coaching model of communication skills training for solid tumor oncologists and their newly diagnosed advanced cancer patients. We audio recorded post-imaging patient-oncologist encounters for patients receiving systemic cancer treatment and coded transcripts for oncologist's use of serious illness communication skills (coded as count/encounter): open-ended questions, reflections, empathic responses to patient empathic opportunities, empathic statements, “sorry” statements, and elicitation of questions. We also assessed global codes of oncologist communication (assessed on 5-point Likert scales): flow, concerns addressed, attention, warmth, and respect. Finally, we coded patient participatory behavior (coded as count/encounter): asking questions and assertive responses. We compared the skills and behaviors by race/ethnicity of the patient using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: We included the 56 (38%) recordings with oncologists who did not receive the intervention. The patients in these encounters were 25 (45%) female; 32 (57%) over the age of 65; 23 (41%) White Non-Hispanic, 20 (36%) Black Non-Hispanic, and 11 (20%) Hispanic. Overall, oncologists responded empathically to patients’ emotions only 19% of the time. Oncologists used fewer reflective statements with Black Non-Hispanic patients (mean 0.3 statements/encounter) as compared to White Non-Hispanic patients (1.1) and Hispanic patients (1.1), p = 0.02. Furthermore, coders rated oncologists as being less likely to address concerns of Black Non-Hispanic patients (mean Likert scale 3.1) as compared to White Non-Hispanic (3.8) and Hispanic (3.4) patients, p = 0.04. Finally, coders rated oncologists as having less warmth with Black Non-Hispanic patients (mean Likert scale 2.9) as compared to White Non-Hispanic (3.8) and Hispanic (3.3) patients, p = 0.04. Conclusions: In this diverse sample of patients with advanced cancer, oncologists used fewer reflective statements, were less attentive to concerns, and expressed less warmth with Black Non-Hispanic patients. Interventions are needed to overcome these striking racial/ethnic disparities in serious illness communication for patients with cancer.