Molecular parameters impacting the success rate of a lung cancer PDX model.

e20592 Background: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models can provide renewable cancer tissue resources, are being increasingly utilized for the molecular characterizations of cancers and preclinical studies on drug activities, and have the potential to advance biomarker identification. Previous research has demonstrated that PDX tumors preserve the histologic and morphologic characteristics and gene expression and mutation patterns of primary tumors, and correlate to patient survival. Tumor histological subtypes and differentiation grades are known to contribute to the success of PDX intake, but little is known about how molecular features associate with the success of PDX engraftment or whether PDX preserves subclonal architecture of primary tumors. Methods: To fill this void, we analyzed 252 primary tumor samples from the SPORE/ICON project at MD Anderson Cancer Center that were used for generating PDXs and had comprehensive genomic, transcriptomic, and immune profiling data available to evaluate the parameters impacting the intake success of lung cancer PDXs. In order to establish the impact of molecular features on PDX intake success we also assessed the fidelity of PDX in representing the molecular features of this cohort of primary tumors. Results: Only 36% of the primary tumors in this study successfully generated a PDX, with Squamous Cell Carcinoma PDX demonstrating an intake rate of 67% and Adenocarcinoma PDX demonstrating an intake rate of 21%. Genomic architecture derived from whole exome sequencing showed not only 43% (38-48%) of mutations shared, but also similar clonal architecture between primary tumors and PDX. Higher copy number aberration burden, high tumor purity and low immune infiltration in primary tumors were found to be associated with successful intake of PDX. Transcriptomics revealed 6,103 genes differentially expressed between primary tumors with successful PDX intake versus those which were unsuccessful. Pathway analysis of these genes indicated that inhibition of cell proliferation, signaling, and migration as well as DNA replication, recombination and repair were associated with PDX intake failure regardless of histology. Conclusions: These findings indicate that PDX intake success is regulated by molecular features and multiomic evaluation of lung cancer primary tumors can be used as a marker for determining which samples to use for PDX model generation.