Quality improvement project: Implementation of I-PASS, a structured patient hand-off tool to improve communication, increase patient safety, and prevent burnout among palliative care providers at a comprehensive cancer center.

65 Background: Communication among the health care providers plays a crucial role in team-based practices, and a standardized communication platform is essential. Our palliative care consult service (PCCS) at a university-based cancer center manages cancer-related symptoms. The handoff process among the providers takes place via encrypted emails shared among the providers. The current demand for palliative care (PC) among the cancer population led to increased patient encounters and associated handoff emails. Numerous handoff emails (sometimes up to 25-30/day) can lead to missing/overlooked information, cause burnout among the providers, and affect patient safety. Studies have shown that implementing I-PASS into clinical practices has significantly reduced medical errors without increasing documentation time. We aimed to improve communication among the PC providers, prevent burnout and increase patient safety by using a built-in I-PASS handoff tool on electronic medical records (EMR). Methods: In January 2021, we formed a team to develop a quality improvement (QI) project to implement I-PASS for our PCCS at our institution. The institutional Quality Improvement Assessment Board approved this QI project. Our team started with Plan, Do, Study, Act. After extensive brainstorming, we mapped out the Cause-and-effect diagram (Fishbone). We laid out a Process mapping through a flowchart and Feasibility impact matrix. The implementation process took place in 4 phases. Phase 1: A per-implementation survey. Phase 2: Extensive training sessions for PC clinicians, both, 1:1 and group sessions. Phase 3: October 2021 I-Pass implementation went live. Phase 4: post-implementing survey to assess provider reception. Results: Based on real-time assessment on EMR, at four months mark, we reached the 100% utilization goal for I-PASS among PC clinicians. In Pre vs. Post-implementation survey, providers perceived they could identify their patient's related information, save time, update handoff daily and locate their assignments without any efforts on I-PASS compared to email handoff (p < 0.0001). Overall, 95% of the PC providers found I-PASS helpful. Conclusions: Standardized communication tools such as I-PASS have proven safe and effective and help prevent provider burnout by improving overall workflow. Future studies need to focus on steps to continue developing tools to help modify the handoff on Smartphone EMR applications such as HAIKU.